<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography, Videography, and Cinematography Converge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://layersmagazine.com/photography-videography-and-cinematography-converge.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://layersmagazine.com/photography-videography-and-cinematography-converge.html</link>
	<description>The How-to Magazine for Everything Adobe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Elliot McGucken</title>
		<link>http://layersmagazine.com/photography-videography-and-cinematography-converge.html/comment-page-1#comment-32273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Elliot McGucken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=6293#comment-32273</guid>
		<description>Yes, but a Canon-based 9shooter system (with the Canon 5D Mark ii &amp; HFS200) costs less than 1/10 cost of the RED EPIC and can be hand-held, as it is far lighter and smaller. The 9shooter also carries the advantages of redundancy and both dedicated stabilization for stills and dynamic stabilization for video, and one can use standard Canon lenses. In a showdown, the &lt;$5,000 9shooter system would beat the $58,000+ EPIC RED hands down. And just you wait until the 9shooter with a Canon 5D Mark III &amp; Mark IV!
http://blog.9shooter.com/2011/06/canon-based-nine-shooter-9shooter-4500.html

In a showdown, the 9shooter beats the EPIC RED hands down.

Canon will eat into Red&#039;s market share far faster than Red will eat into Canon&#039;s market share. 

The 5d Mark III &amp; IV, sdhx cards, USB3 hard drives--all these things will erode the Red Market share. 

Think about it--are google and facebook and amazon built from IBM mainframes?  Or from off-the-shelf components designed for the masses?  What happened to Sun Microsystems?  RED is the Sun Microsystems.  Canon is the Microsoft/Dell/Apple in this case.  Today&#039;s $299 laptop from Fry&#039;s electronics beats the $20,000 Sun Ultra Spark Station from ten years ago. 

Moore&#039;s law tends to favor companies reaching up far more than companies reaching down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but a Canon-based 9shooter system (with the Canon 5D Mark ii &amp; HFS200) costs less than 1/10 cost of the RED EPIC and can be hand-held, as it is far lighter and smaller. The 9shooter also carries the advantages of redundancy and both dedicated stabilization for stills and dynamic stabilization for video, and one can use standard Canon lenses. In a showdown, the &lt;$5,000 9shooter system would beat the $58,000+ EPIC RED hands down. And just you wait until the 9shooter with a Canon 5D Mark III &amp; Mark IV!<br />
<a href="http://blog.9shooter.com/2011/06/canon-based-nine-shooter-9shooter-4500.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.9shooter.com/2011/06/canon-based-nine-shooter-9shooter-4500.html</a></p>
<p>In a showdown, the 9shooter beats the EPIC RED hands down.</p>
<p>Canon will eat into Red&#039;s market share far faster than Red will eat into Canon&#039;s market share. </p>
<p>The 5d Mark III &amp; IV, sdhx cards, USB3 hard drives&#8211;all these things will erode the Red Market share. </p>
<p>Think about it&#8211;are google and facebook and amazon built from IBM mainframes?  Or from off-the-shelf components designed for the masses?  What happened to Sun Microsystems?  RED is the Sun Microsystems.  Canon is the Microsoft/Dell/Apple in this case.  Today&#039;s $299 laptop from Fry&#039;s electronics beats the $20,000 Sun Ultra Spark Station from ten years ago. </p>
<p>Moore&#039;s law tends to favor companies reaching up far more than companies reaching down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://layersmagazine.com/photography-videography-and-cinematography-converge.html/comment-page-1#comment-8074</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=6293#comment-8074</guid>
		<description>Jannard is living proof of originality unfettered, and properly funded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jannard is living proof of originality unfettered, and properly funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://layersmagazine.com/photography-videography-and-cinematography-converge.html/comment-page-1#comment-8073</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=6293#comment-8073</guid>
		<description>Mindblowing possibilities, especially the dynamic range figures. Out of reach in financial terms of the majority but then, not so long ago, was the 1.5MP Kodak DCS 200. Very exciting future indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mindblowing possibilities, especially the dynamic range figures. Out of reach in financial terms of the majority but then, not so long ago, was the 1.5MP Kodak DCS 200. Very exciting future indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

