Comments on: Lightroom Web Galleries Need to go Emeril – BAM! Take it up a Notch http://layersmagazine.com/lightroom-web-galleries-need-to-go-emeril-bam-take-it-up-a-notch.html The How-to Magazine for Everything Adobe Fri, 11 May 2012 10:52:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Lisa Price http://layersmagazine.com/lightroom-web-galleries-need-to-go-emeril-bam-take-it-up-a-notch.html/comment-page-1#comment-8935 Lisa Price Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:05:06 +0000 http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=9054#comment-8935 Yes, I must aggree, the Update is a total must. I feel completely disappointed about the web gallery. I would like to see a "Update existing Template" Button. click it, select location , update it with additional (for example just images selected) , click it adds just images but does not touch anything else , like formating etc. And done, up to the next job. That doesn't sound to complicated for the guys who developed something great like lightroom! Yes, I must aggree, the Update is a total must. I feel completely disappointed about the web gallery.
I would like to see a “Update existing Template” Button.
click it, select location , update it with additional (for example just images selected) , click it adds just images but does not touch anything else , like formating etc.
And done, up to the next job.

That doesn’t sound to complicated for the guys who developed something great like lightroom!

]]> By: Notable NAPP Links for the Week of June 28, 2009 | My Home Sweet Home http://layersmagazine.com/lightroom-web-galleries-need-to-go-emeril-bam-take-it-up-a-notch.html/comment-page-1#comment-8932 Notable NAPP Links for the Week of June 28, 2009 | My Home Sweet Home Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:19:05 +0000 http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=9054#comment-8932 [...] Suggestions for Lightroom’s Web Galleries [...] [...] Suggestions for Lightroom’s Web Galleries [...]

]]> By: Steve http://layersmagazine.com/lightroom-web-galleries-need-to-go-emeril-bam-take-it-up-a-notch.html/comment-page-1#comment-8934 Steve Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:29:05 +0000 http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=9054#comment-8934 I use Lightroom Flash Web Galleries all the time to upload my photos to my server then link them in Dreamweaver. I always use the default Flash gallery for one reason, it is simple and easy to navigate and that is what clients want, simplicity. If I stumble upon a website that has an option for Flash or non Flash I always choose non because I just want to get to the content I am looking for and not impressed with the"WOW" effect of a candy coated website. Most clients agree with me . I hate those flying in flashy Flash sites. So the moral to this story is, simple is better. I use Lightroom Flash Web Galleries all the time to upload my photos to my server then link them in Dreamweaver. I always use the default Flash gallery for one reason, it is simple and easy to navigate and that is what clients want, simplicity. If I stumble upon a website that has an option for Flash or non Flash I always choose non because I just want to get to the content I am looking for and not impressed with the”WOW” effect of a candy coated website. Most clients agree with me . I hate those flying in flashy Flash sites. So the moral to this story is, simple is better.

]]> By: A.J. Wood http://layersmagazine.com/lightroom-web-galleries-need-to-go-emeril-bam-take-it-up-a-notch.html/comment-page-1#comment-8933 A.J. Wood Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:18:44 +0000 http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=9054#comment-8933 I appreciate the thought put into your suggestions. Spoken like someone who's pushing the limits of the software. I appreciate the thought put into your suggestions. Spoken like someone who’s pushing the limits of the software.

]]>